Arts4All, Ltd. v. Judith L. Hancock/Judith L. Hancock v. Daniel Y.C. Ng, No. 206 SSM 32 (N.Y. 2009)

New York Court of Appeals, Memorandum (October 20, 2009)

Permanent Link: http://nyca.vlex.com/vid/69026486
Id. vLex: VLEX-69026486

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Document language

Request manual translation

Search in this document

Document options

Text:

This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before

publication in the New York Reports.

--------------------------------------------------------------

No. 206 SSM 32
Arts4All, Ltd., et al.,
Respondents,
v.
Judith L. Hancock,
Appellant,
---------------------------------
Judith L. Hancock,
Counterclaim Plaintiff-
Appellant,
v.
Daniel Y.C. Ng, et al.,
Additional Defendants on
Counterclaims,
Peter Osgood,
Respondent.

Submitted by David G. Trachtenberg, for appellant.

Submitted by Zachary R. Greenhill, for respondents.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, with costs, and certified question not answered as unnecessary. The courts below did not abuse their discretion in dismissing defendant's counterclaims pursuant to CPLR 3126(3) (see Arts4All, Ltd. v Hancock, 12 NY3d 846 [2009]). Defendant's remaining argument is without merit. Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur. Chief Judge Lippman took no part.

Decided October 20, 2009